<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Updates</title>
	<atom:link href="http://uncluttr.wordpress.com/2007/07/31/july-31-updates/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://uncluttr.wordpress.com/2007/07/31/july-31-updates/</link>
	<description>clean &#38; green</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 18:43:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Derek</title>
		<link>http://uncluttr.wordpress.com/2007/07/31/july-31-updates/#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>Derek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2007 08:46:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uncluttr.wordpress.com/2007/07/31/july-31-updates/#comment-13</guid>
		<description>yup, i did; our choice was either libxml-ruby or hpricot .  libxml won for completely arbitrary reasons.  I&#039;m not sure which one of those two is strictly better, but so far, libxml has beat the pants off of REXML.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yup, i did; our choice was either libxml-ruby or hpricot .  libxml won for completely arbitrary reasons.  I&#8217;m not sure which one of those two is strictly better, but so far, libxml has beat the pants off of REXML.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JRice</title>
		<link>http://uncluttr.wordpress.com/2007/07/31/july-31-updates/#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>JRice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2007 02:39:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uncluttr.wordpress.com/2007/07/31/july-31-updates/#comment-12</guid>
		<description>...Have you considered using why&#039;s hpricot for the XML parsing?

A co-worker just started using, claiming that it blew rexml off the map, speed wise.

[shrug]  Just a thought.  I hadn&#039;t considered it because it was a &quot;web scraper&quot;, but I guess it fares quite well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;Have you considered using why&#8217;s hpricot for the XML parsing?</p>
<p>A co-worker just started using, claiming that it blew rexml off the map, speed wise.</p>
<p>[shrug]  Just a thought.  I hadn&#8217;t considered it because it was a &#8220;web scraper&#8221;, but I guess it fares quite well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
